Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Umair's avatar
Jan 6Edited

thanks for bringing this insight guys... you guys are top!

however some of the biggest concerns regarding the 'hierarchy' have not been addressed by them and there is alot of contradiction in their responses.

- they say they want to buy high potential players and compete financially as they cant keep up with the 5 clubs mentioned above. Then why have they signed players like Gittens, Mudryk, Jorgensen, Felix, KDH, Disasi and a few others... who are avg players at best and cost us a fortune. They are neither 'high potential' nor 'bargains'. Its funny they cite financial differences between the clubs but at the same time have blown away 2bn and only have Palmer and Caicedo to show are unqualified successes. We have the most expensive squad in the history of football... surely if you want to close the gap you make better decisions both on the sporting side and the financial side. What THEY are saying is just a contradiction.

- wage structure: Its good to have one but there is no way in the world you can miss out on players like Olise, Etikite and then spend the same money (in terms of fee and wages) on more avg players. The squad is worse off and you have dug a hole financially. Will the make exceptions for players like Reece who is on high wages and our most important player?

- The market freedom and PSR issues are of their own making. Overpaying for so many players will have an impact....

- closing the gap on the top teams require that you improve the squad window by window.... they have done the exact 'OPPOSITE' of that.

- how can they say they have alignment with managers on recruitment and want to address the physicality issue when 'THEY' have made this squad! Any fan will know the physicality issue in the PL.. these guys came from PL and ignored all that. They have built a squad in such a way that the manager will be pretty much forced to play with a 10 when maybe a 3 man midfield is a better option for the league. Poch asked for physicality in the midfield and he was shown the door for questioning them.

- another thing to add... they talk a great deal about data and scouting. How come most of their signings are from their previous clubs or the ones that their previous clubs targeted. Seems more of a case of 'who the SDs' know rather then what is needed to make the squad better.

As I said you have done a great job reaching out to them and raising some concerns but 'THEIR' response are full of contradictions and damage control exercise.

Mitch Cumstein's avatar

Kudos on getting the discussion and interesting to read, but I'm a little bit cynical simply because it's easy to think a lot of this is just PR spin to say what the fans want to hear...

Was the stadium brought up? Because that to me is the most important issue facing the club. Oh, and were questions asked about why we're leaving millions on the table each year with the front of shirt sponsor situation?

109 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?